What data do you already track about yourself, or have you tracked in the past but no longer pay attention to? Why have you made these choices? What do you get out of it? What are the advantages/disadvantages of self-tracking? Of using digital devices to help us do it? What patterns do you think are present in your life, but don’t have the data to back it up? (For example, the person who found that coffee actually hurts his concentration, or the person who found that watching a bad movie made him feel negative about his own film career).
Data that I track about myself on a routine basis relates to my exercise habits. I am an avid runner, and I track various aspects of this activity. This includes everything from the date and time of my run, the length of my run (measured in miles and in time), my average pace for each mile, and my heart rate. The device that aids me in easily tracking these factors is my FitBit. I have an application on my cellphone that pairs with the device to log all of this data. I track this data for several reasons, one of the main reasons being my participation in multiple 5k’s and running fundraisers throughout the year. I like to feel prepared when participating in these events, and by tracking my running data I give myself the ease of mind knowing that I can conquer the event without feeling like my lungs are collapsing or without fear of failure. It helps me make adjustments to things such as my breathing techniques or my stride, so I can improve my run times and my stamina throughout each run.
I also track this data because it undoubtedly gives me a feeling of self-accomplishment. Not many people wake up at three thirty in the morning and roll out of bed and say “Yes, I am so stoked to go run three miles before work!”. I am that special kind of crazy; but this feeling is not exclusive to every morning of my life. Tracking my runs and being able to reflect back on the data makes me feel like I am superwoman, and if I can make it through my morning run, any challenge that I may face throughout the remainder of my day pales in comparison. It is a psychological boost. It gives me mental clarity, and wipes away my stresses.
Of course, as with anything, there are some disadvantages to tracking this information. On days when I am not feeling 100% and I struggle to keep my average pace, or I cannot run as far as I normally would, I look back at the data and tend to feel defeated. While this happens less and less (as I learn to not be so hard on myself!), it still does occur. I have noticed that on select days when I have a “shitty” run, my attitude for the rest of the day is definitely compromised. This is a pattern that I know is present in my life, but I do not necessarily have any data to back it up. I suppose I could start tracking my moods on a regular basis via a journal of some sort, and examine the correlation between my mood and how “successful” my run for the day was. It would be interesting to have the data to prove my theory. Overall, I do believe that tracking this activity is more beneficial for me than it does harm me. Running is a therapy tool in my life, and I do enjoy watching my progress and feeling a sense of accomplishment.
If you took the SAT or ACT, did you opt to let the company share your scores with schools? What did you gain from that decision, and how do you feel about it in light of the article? How does the College Board (the company behind the SAT)’s business model intersect with what you learned about college rankings? How should standardized tests be used in college admissions (or, should they be used at all)? What do SAT scores and the methods by which they are measured reveal about students, and what do they hide?
I took the SAT examination multiple times throughout my high school career; five times to be specific. I took this exam so many times out of fear that I would be rejected from colleges if I did not have a high enough score. I felt there was always room for improvement. Each time, I did opt to let the company share my scores with schools. However, I mostly did this out of ignorance. I was not really sure what schools would do with this data, nor did I really care at the time. After reading the article and learning about what colleges do with this data, I can sincerely say I am appalled. Who benefits from the purchase of students test scores? This is certainly not done for the greater good of the students. College applications are expensive and time consuming. It is a waste of time and energy to have students apply to colleges that they never stood a chance of getting into in the first place, in order for “prestigious” colleges to maintain low acceptance rates. Are these colleges really all that prestigious if they purposely solicit applicants that were never qualified in the first place just so they can reject them?
Additionally, I do not believe that standardized testing should be utilized to measure a student’s worth or gauge how successful they will be in their future endeavors. Furthermore, there have been plenty of successful people in modern times that do not even possess a college education! According to the article “15 Super Successful People Who Never Graduated College” from money.com, Ellen Degeneres whose net worth is approximately $400 million, and Steve Jobs, whose net worth at the time of his death was $10.2 billion, are among the chart toppers of college drop outs. I’m sure nobody stopped to ask what the hell their SAT scores were. A test cannot measure how successful a person will be. Colleges should be spending more time interviewing prospective students, rather than studying their test scores.