Author Archives: KAMILLA JELANNIKOVA

Kamila Bandwagon and Namecalling

Bandwagon

Example 1: Animal Farm (By George Orwell)

“In the novel Animal Farm, George Orwell uses bandwagon technique effectively. At the very beginning, a song “Beasts of England” seems to be very appealing and catchy, because everyone picks it up so swiftly as if they like the idea. Again, we see this technique when Boxer, a powerful and loyal animal on the farm, promotes bandwagon propaganda inadvertently with his work ethics, as he always tries to work hard. He maintains the view that, “If Comrade Napoleon says it, it must be right.” This shows he wishes to follow Comrade Napoleon and his ideas.

Bandwagon technique continues to exist as the animal only accept the ideals and changing commandments because other animals are doing the same. Another bandwagon technique comes out when Mollie is curious to know whether she will be able to wear precious ribbons and have sugar after Rebellion. However, Snowball informs her that they symbolize slavery and Mollie accepts this without any resistance, although she never believes it.”

Example 2: Julius Caesar (By William Shakespeare)

In William Shakespeare’s playJulius Caesar, Mark Antony delivers his famous speech at the funeral of Caesar, which is a brilliant example of bandwagon. Mark Antony has delivered this magnificent speech to win over the favor of the audience. He negates excuses that Brutus had made, though he had calmed down the public and persuaded them that Caesar had to die for their good. Antony comes forward and tells them that he hopes the crowd would not riot, and convinces them that Cassius and Brutus were murderers and responsible for ripping apart the town. Speaking on a personal level, Antony grabs public attention as he leaves his position and, being a commoner saying, “Friends, Romans, Countrymen.

Name Calling

Example 1: “Sometimes there is an implied threat that if you make an unpopular decision or arrive at a conclusion that isn’t favored, a negative label will be applied to you. For instance, someone might say, ‘Only a naive moron would believe that’ to influence your attitude on an issue. This strategy of anticipatory name calling makes it difficult for you to declare that you favor the negatively valued belief because it means that you make yourself look like a ‘naive moron.’ Anticipatory name-calling can also invoke positive group memberships, such as asserting that ‘all true Americans will agree . . .’ or ‘people in the know think that . . ..’ Anticipatory name calling is a shrewd tactic that can be effective in shaping people’s thinking.”
(Wayne Weiten, Psychology: Themes and Variations, 9th ed. Wadsworth, 2013) “Sometimes there is an implied threat that if you make an unpopular decision or arrive at a conclusion that isn’t favored, a negative label will be applied to you. For instance, someone might say, ‘Only a naive moron would believe that’ to influence your attitude on an issue. This strategy of anticipatory name calling makes it difficult for you to declare that you favor the negatively valued belief because it means that you make yourself look like a ‘naive moron.’ Anticipatory name-calling can also invoke positive group memberships, such as asserting that ‘all true Americans will agree . . .’ or ‘people in the know think that . . ..’ Anticipatory name calling is a shrewd tactic that can be effective in shaping people’s thinking.”
(Wayne Weiten, Psychology: Themes and Variations, 9th ed. Wadsworth, 2013)

“In politics, association is often accomplished by name-calling–linking a person or idea to a negative symbol. The persuader hopes that the receiver will reject the person or idea on the basis of the negative symbol, rather than by examining the evidence. For example, those who oppose budget cuts may refer to fiscally conservative politicians as ‘stingy,’ thus creating a negative association, although the same person could equally be referred to as ‘thrifty’ by supporters. Similarly, candidates have a list of negative words and phrases that they use when speaking about their opponents. Some of these are betray, coercion, collapse, corruption, crisis, decay, destroy, endanger, failure, greed, hypocrisy, incompetent, insecure, liberal, permissive attitude, shallow, sick, traitors, and unionized.”
(Herbert W. Simons, Persuasion in Society. Sage, 2001)

Example 2:

“Sometimes there is an implied threat that if you make an unpopular decision or arrive at a conclusion that isn’t favored, a negative label will be applied to you. For instance, someone might say, ‘Only a naive moron would believe that’ to influence your attitude on an issue. This strategy of anticipatory name calling makes it difficult for you to declare that you favor the negatively valued belief because it means that you make yourself look like a ‘naive moron.’ Anticipatory name-calling can also invoke positive group memberships, such as asserting that ‘all true Americans will agree . . .’ or ‘people in the know think that . . ..’ Anticipatory name calling is a shrewd tactic that can be effective in shaping people’s thinking.”
(Wayne Weiten, Psychology: Themes and Variations, 9th ed. Wadsworth, 2013)

Kamila Ad Analysis

1. The speaker in the ad is a Pepsi-Cola Company.The speaker trying to present themselves that their drink is very tasty and suitable for any meal and any party. He shows on this ad that they are very happy and funny.

2.The message  on the ad says: It fun to cook with this drink, make good confersation, when you drinking you feel like you bouncing.  They enjoy and have fun with drink as is says below photo: WHY TAKE LESS…WHEN PEPSI BEST.

3. The assumptions in the ad is says:MORE BOUNCE TO THE PEPSI BOUNCE.

4.  The audience of the ad IS people who drinking pepsi and smiling.

5. The strategies the ad to try to persuade the audience is the people happy, smile , the picnic floor food and bbq meal.

6.The pathos to presuade the audience to show people is happy and food delicios with this drink Pepsi.

7. The  advertising is very effective will work if a person who is very hungry and  if he or she see this ad and at this moment he or she is feel thirsty, then of course it is effective.  But I also think that it may not work for many people, such as vegetarians, or who are dieting, or those people who are against sugary carbonated drinks.

  1. The speaker in the ad is a Pepsi-Cola Company.The speaker trying to present themselves that their drink is very tasty and suitable for any meal and any party. He shows on this ad that they are very happy and funny.
  2. The message on the ad says: It fun to cook with this drink, make good conversation, when you drinking you feel like you bouncing. They enjoy and have fun with drink as is says below photo: WHY TAKE LESS…WHEN PEPSI BEST.
  3. The assumptions in the ad is says:MORE BOUNCE TO THE PEPSI BOUNCE.
  4. The audience of the ad IS people who drinking Pepsi and smiling.
  5. The strategies the ad to try to persuade the audience is the people happy, smile , the picnic floor food and BBQ meal.
  6. The pathos to persuade the audience to show people is happy and food delicious with this drink Pepsi.
  7. The advertising is very effective will work if a person who is very hungry and if he or she see this ad and at this moment he or she is feel thirsty, then of course it is effective. But I also think that it may not work for many people, such as vegetarians, or who are dieting, or those people who are against sugary carbonated drinks.

Blog Assignment 2-Kamilla

I learned about John Jay college myself when I was looking for a specialty for whom I can learn and go work in this area. And also study new subjects and develop yourself as a whole. But the most interesting thing is ahead.  I am transfer student. In 2013, I went to Kingsborough community college, but due to circumstances I dropped out.  And again it began to be submitted only in 2018, the process itself took me a very long time, it seems like all the documents came to college and I thought cheers, I’ll start studying and will be a student again. But unfortunately not all the documents reached and it was necessary to run around with the papers. And by this time, in 2019 had come, I often checked on the Cuny page and went to college many times, there is one problem then another, in general I should have been studying in 2019 in August, but they tell me that they say there are more documents  not in the system, so again I started fussing and running.  In 2020 has already come.  It seems that they had all the information and I started moving further and registering for classes, etc. But when the classes started, I just got lost in this John Jay college, I did not know where to go where the office for help is, etc., but I am very grateful to the good people  here in college for their help, who told me where and how.  I am very glad that there good, positive people in the John Jay college. I am very happy to study at John Jay college. And I really want to finish it.  I hope I succeed.

Blog Assignment-Kamilla

I hope Everybody Liked 🙂

enjoy to read 🙂

Two centuries differ from each other in many ways – the current and past XX and XXI centuries. Life dictates its own conditions: its rhythm is accelerated, it is oversaturated with information. The world goes to another level, an incredible amount of new ones is being created. This does not change: careful and reverent attitude towards children; both to their own and to a whole generation of children. Grandparents. Children are the future, everyone knows that. The quality of life in a few years, technological progress, the state of the environment, and the level of medicine depend on how these children will be raised and how much effort will be invested in them. Are there people who are indifferent to the future of their city, state, planet? It is in the interests of everyone to educate a worthy Man, to raise a real citizen, to endow him with important values. Our great-grandfathers thought so, so we now think.The difference between a modern child and children of past generations is noticeable to the naked eye. So why are the children in whom the seemingly equal amount of love and care invested, so different from their peers who lived a century, half a century, or even twenty years ago?

First, consider the reasons for such differences. Undoubtedly, the most important role in them is played by changing living conditions. Today’s children grow up in a completely different, hundreds of times more saturated information field. The modern world provides in abundance information that children can only absorb, without making certain efforts. Indeed, you must agree that in order to raise data on a topic, it is easier to open a page on the Internet than to search through a two-volume reference book, go to a library or visit a museum. So what are they, modern children? The first distinguishing feature that is characteristic of modern children, which I would like to note, is the need for continuous monitoring. In the last century, parents, grandparents, could leave the child in the apartment, reminding him only that the door should not be opened to anyone and should not indulge in matches. They left for half a day in complete confidence that the apartment would remain safe and sound until their return. Now, with the advent of numerous gadgets, expensive equipment, expensive furniture, insecurity and fear of both life and health are inherent in parents child’s health, and for the safety of an expensive leather sofa, new parquet and a plasma TV. Indeed, in our time, children at an early age are unusually smart, act instantly. This allows them to carry destruction with great speed.

Previously, parents, leaving the child in a room with an uncomplicated toy in private, could easily have dinner and talk. Now you need to be in constant direct contact with the child. Otherwise, in the best case, damage to household property is inevitable, and in the worst case, injuries and other unpleasant consequences. Accordingly, in order to avoid problems, parents invite nannies and governesses, or they send their children to special institutions, which in the first and in the second case entails certain consequences, often negative. It is enough to compare the games played by children of different eras. Previously – soft toys, cubes, designers, railways, mosaics, dolls. Now – computer games, cartoons from the Internet or TV, mobile phones, game consoles. And progress regularly equips children with newer and newer “toys.”

The second item on the list of characteristic features of the current generation of children, I would put a constant thirst for attention. This could be attributed to upbringing, politeness and punctuality, but, as the trend is growing, it is rather a “disease” of an entire era, rather than individual families.

Previously, a child on a walk was left to his own devices, could spend hours entertaining himself in the sandbox or near a large puddle, for example, launching boats and spanking in boots on the water. Parents at this time had the opportunity to read the newspaper or spent time talking. Now you rarely see such a picture. A modern child insistently pulls on the sleeve of his mother, who has stopped to talk with a friend, turns around, is naughty, meets in an adult conversation and does her best to draw attention to herself until she receives it. Children of past generations calmly waited for the conversation to end. If you do not pay attention to these antics of modern children, the case may turn into a serious resentment. When today’s children want to share their opinions, they actively draw attention to themselves, shout, cry, do everything to be noticed and allowed to speak. If this fails, they are offended. Another suitable definition for modern children, I consider the word “all-knowing.” They have a radically increased need for information, but also a well-developed ability to perceive and process it. But in children, the choice of the object of study, of course, is limited to the most interesting information. That is, about pirates and, for example, horses, they get an exhaustive amount of data. Television and the Internet instantly provide any information in unlimited quantities. Open access allows you to get any knowledge, you just need to click on a couple of buttons. Nevertheless, it remains to recognize the fact that the worldwide network plays a huge role in raising a modern child. But in this notorious open access to the Internet there are also dangers: the availability of information that threatens the normal psychological and emotional development of the child.

In conclusion, I can say that if we compare the modern preschooler with the children of the sixties of the last century, the differences in world perception, pace of development, behavior and self-awareness become apparent. And it is impossible to apply the approaches and methods that were relevant 20, 30, 40 and 50 years ago in the education of a modern child. Each new generation is unique, and each specific child is unique. The key to success of parents will be an individual approach and attentive attitude to the child.